Quick Tap 2

Projects

Quick Tap 2 is designed to assess response inhibition using a classic go/no-go paradigm. Participants start with a brief animated tutorial, where they learn to tap a target image (e.g., a dog) as quickly as possible while avoiding a foil image (e.g., a cat). During the test, images are presented at randomized intervals of 1 to 5 seconds. A response is considered correct if the target image is tapped within 2 seconds. Responses are considered incorrect if the target is tapped too early, not tapped at all, or if the foil image is tapped. Immediate feedback can be provided after each trial to enhance engagement and understanding.

Customize:

Number of trials (e.g., can be trial-based or time-based)
Trial-by-trial feedback given to the participant
Summary feedback given to the participant (e.g., graphical representation of number correct)
Participants have the option to mute all sound alerts during the test

Data collected:

Correct count: Total number of correct responses
Incorrect count: Total number of incorrect responses Target missed count: Number of times the target was not tapped
Tapped too soon count: Number of times tapped before any image appeared
False hits: Number of times the foil was tapped
Reaction time per trial
Fastest reaction time (for correct trials)
Median reaction time (for correct trials)
Median false hits reaction time (for incorrect trials)

Validated:

Quick Tap 1This test has been validated in a general adult sample and used with several other populations such as adults with serious mental illness and cancer.

Published Studies

Initial Psychometric Properties of 7 NeuroUX Remote Ecological Momentary Cognitive Tests Among People With Bipolar Disorder: Validation Study

Authors: Raeanne C Moore, Emma M Parrish, Ryan Van Patten, Emily Paolillo, Tess F Filip, Jessica Bomyea, Derek Lomas, Elizabeth W Twamley, Lisa T Eyler, Colin A Depp
‍
‍Year Published: 2022

Assessing Cancer-related Cognitive Function in the Context of Everyday life using Ecological Mobile Cognitive Testing: A protocol for a Prospective Quantitative Study

Authors: Ashley M Henneghan, Kathleen M Van Dyk, Robert A Ackerman, Emily W Paolillo, Raeanne C Moore
‍
‍Year Published: 2022